Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:49:16 -0700
I wrote:
You're asking, if I parse the question correctly, whether the set of
statements P such that every statement A undecidable in ZFC+P has the
property that it is conservative over ZFC+P for arithmetical
statements is recursively enumerable. The answer is that this set,
being empty, is trivially recursively enumerable.
A correction: the set is empty if we require ZFC+P to be consistent,
and the set of sentences P such that P is refutable in ZFC otherwise.
Both are r.e. of course.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- References:
- Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Continuum hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|