Re: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:21:46 -0700
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Scott wrote:
Hi: Given any set S with transfinite cardinality x, what is theRestricting xi to ordinals and kappa to cardinals, ie initial ordinals, a
correct notation for showing a list of this set. For example (using
latex notation):
S = { s_0, s_1, s_2, ..., s_{w_x} }
Would this be the correct notation? Or would it just be
S = { s_0, s_1, s_2, ... }
set S of cardinality kappa can be represented as a well ordered set with
S = { a_xi | xi < kappa }
The representation is not unique, just the most efficient or slickest.
It is not possible to 'list' the reals for a list is a set of the form
{ a_n | n in N }
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- References:
- Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- From: Scott
- Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- Prev by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- Next by thread: Re: Request for help in proper notation of ordinals.
- Index(es):