Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- From: herbzet <herbzet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:01:45 -0400
aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
george wrote:
Wrong. The downward Lowenheim-Skolem theorem shows
that the upward Lowenheim-Skolem theorem is just stupid.
Positively retarded indeed.
This is an Occam's Razor issue. The question is whether
uncountable cardinalities ACTUALLY exist. If they don't then
there is simply nothing for the theorem to prove.
You're deluded. In reality, only uncountable and finite sets exist.
Countable sets are just a piece of fantasy.
However, we can still say of N that it is countable, if of
the non-existent we can truly predicate anything.
--
hz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- References:
- The shocking truth about the naturals
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- From: george
- Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- The shocking truth about the naturals
- Prev by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- Next by thread: Re: The shocking truth about the naturals
- Index(es):