# sci.logic

**Why did Boolos change his mind?**,*Caboose***Proof of a certain theorem in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman**,*translogi***Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)**,*translogi***A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*Zaljohar***Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*MoeBlee***Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*Rupert***Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*G . Frege***Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*G . Frege***Re: A question about ackermann's set theory.**,*G . Frege*

**what is reification?**,*YKY***Re: what is reification?**,*mbstevens***Re: what is reification?**,*John Jones***Re: what is reification?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: what is reification?**,*John Jones*

**for solution manuals visit**,*techie***Godel uses the axiom of reducibility which make his incompleteness theorem invalid**,*elsiemelsi***Godel uses impredicative statements which make his incompleteness theorem invalid**,*elsiemelsi***Is a set object exhaustive?**,*John Jones***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*G . Frege***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*G . Frege***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*G . Frege*

**Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*george***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*george***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*G . Frege*

**Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*John Jones*

**Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*Marshall***Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*John Jones*

**Re: Is a set object exhaustive?**,*John Jones*

**question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*Min JIANG***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*translogi***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*translogi***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*translogi***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*translogi***Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*Min JIANG*

**Re: question regrading tautology and valid formula**,*Peter_Smith*

**Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Rupert***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Rupert***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Rupert***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Jan Burse***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Jan Burse***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar***Re: Zuhair's set theory**,*Zaljohar*

**What do you call it when two things are similar, but the difference is emphasized?**,*Scott H***Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*LauLuna***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Marshall***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*planetnoob***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege*

**Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*george***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones*

**Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Fuckwit***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*John Jones***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*MoeBlee***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*Jan Burse***Re: Cantor's definition of set**,*G . Frege*

**Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry*

**Re: Model here, model there**,*george***Re: Model here, model there**,*LauLuna***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Model here, model there**,*george***Re: Model here, model there**,*translogi***Re: Model here, model there**,*george***Re: Model here, model there**,*translogi***Re: Model here, model there**,*george***Re: Model here, model there**,*translogi***Re: Model here, model there**,*translogi***Re: Model here, model there**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Model here, model there**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Model here, model there**,*Newberry***Re: Model here, model there**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Model here, model there**,*David Auerbach***Re: Model here, model there**,*george***Re: Model here, model there**,*David Auerbach*

**The Wolfram 2,3 Turing Machine Research Prize - Announcement**,*egalois***dimensions**,*Sparky***[] dimensions**,*William Elliot***Re: [] dimensions**,*Sparky***Re: [] dimensions**,*William Elliot***Re: [] dimensions**,*Sparky***Re: [] dimensions**,*William Elliot***Re: [] dimensions**,*abseeguiz***Re: [] dimensions**,*William Elliot***Re: [] dimensions**,*kunzmilan*

**Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Rupert***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*MoeBlee***Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Rupert*

**Re: Naive Comprehension.**,*Jan Burse*

**Modal logic from T B and 4 to S5**,*translogi***Re: Modal logic from T B and 4 to S5**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Modal logic from T B and 4 to S5**,*translogi*

**Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*translogi***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Peter_Smith*

**Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*george***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*george***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Marshall*

**Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Jan Burse***Re: Godel and the Limitations of Proof**,*Jack Campin - bogus address*

**Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Rupert***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Bill Taylor*

**Re: Non standard models of PA**,*LauLuna***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus*

**Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*MoeBlee***Re: Non standard models of PA**,*george*

**Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*Peter Webb***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*mbstevens***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*Rupert***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is there anything illogical in Christians asking athiests to prove that there is not a God ?**,*LauLuna*

**Prove that, if x AND x-1 = 0 then x=2^m (m>=0).**,*Srinu**Message not available*

**CFP: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR CRISIS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT**,*jdokas@xxxxxxxxx***A garbage free logic forum?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*William Elliot***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*LauLuna***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Peter Webb***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Peter_Smith*

**Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*G . Frege***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*translogi***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*G . Frege*

**Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Jack Campin - bogus address***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Marshall***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*MoeBlee***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*translogi***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Jan Burse***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*Jan Burse***Re: A garbage free logic forum?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Linear temporal logic with only past**,*Christophe Jacquet***Re: Linear temporal logic with only past**,*Jan Burse*

**3rd paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that makes it invalid**,*elsiemelsi***Re: 3rd paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that makes it invalid**,*george**Message not available*

**2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it invalid**,*elsiemelsi***Re: 2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it invalid**,*george**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: 2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it inval**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: 2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it inval**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: 2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it inval**,*translogi***Re: 2nd paradox in Godels incomplertenes theorem that makes it inval**,*george*

**George admitts colin leslie dean is correct**,*elsiemelsi***george does not understand godels impredicative statements 2**,*elsiemelsi***Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*Colin***Re: Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*Jan Burse***Re: Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*Peter_Smith*

**Re: Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*george***Re: Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*george***Re: Please don't respond to elsiemelsi**,*translogi*

**George does not understand what the meta-theory of Godel is**,*elsiemelsi***What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*Peter Webb***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*george***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*William Elliot***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*gelatinx***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*MoeBlee***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*george***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*MoeBlee***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: What is not(Axiom of Choice), exactly ?**,*george*

**George does not understand the criteria for undecidablity**,*elsiemelsi***george does not understand godels impredicative statements**,*elsiemelsi***Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*george***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*Jack Campin - bogus address*

**Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*Jack Campin - bogus address***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Peter smith should get a new job or rewrite his book on Godel**,*translogi*

**peter smith is wrong about GODEL AND IMPREDICATIVE DEFINITIONS 3**,*elsiemelsi***peter smith is wrong about GODEL AND IMPREDICATIVE DEFINITIONS 2**,*elsiemelsi***peter smith is wrong about GODEL AND IMPREDICATIVE DEFINITIONS**,*elsiemelsi*- <Possible follow-ups>
**peter smith is wrong about GODEL AND IMPREDICATIVE DEFINITIONS**,*elsiemelsi*

**Godel was arrogant and a law unto himself**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godel was arrogant and a law unto himself**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel was arrogant and a law unto himself**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Godel was arrogant and a law unto himself**,*george*

**Re: Godels incompleteness theorem 2 proven invalid**,*Peter_Smith***impredicative statements**,*translogi***Re: impredicative statements**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: impredicative statements**,*Peter_Smith***Re: impredicative statements**,*translogi***Re: impredicative statements**,*translogi*

**Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*Scott***Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*Scott*

**Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*LordBeotian***Re: Question regarding the diagonal method.**,*translogi*

**Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*G . Frege***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*MoeBlee***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Marshall***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones**Message not available***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Jan Burse***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Fuckwit***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Marshall***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Marshall***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*Marshall***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*george***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*G . Frege***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*G . Frege***Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'**,*John Jones*

**How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang**,*ExtrêmeAchillès***American Logic**,*William Elliot***Re: American Logic**,*george***Re: American Logic**,*William Elliot***Re: American Logic**,*CreatheistUU***Re: American Logic**,*george***Re: American Logic**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Modal logic MV**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Modal logic MV**,*translogi*

**Sad day for Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*G . Frege***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*george*

**Re: Sad day for Logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*John Jones*

**Re: Sad day for Logic**,*george***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*John Jones**Message not available***Re: Sad day for Logic**,*John Jones*

**What is the connection between complexity of computation and sub recursive hierarchies?**,*Frederick Williams***basic textbook on set theory**,*translogi***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Frederick Williams***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*george***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Peter_Smith***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Frederick Williams***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*george***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*translogi***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*george***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*george***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Frederick Williams***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*george***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*G . Frege*

**Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*G . Frege*

**Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*G . Frege***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*translogi***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Marshall***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*Marshall***Re: basic textbook on set theory**,*MoeBlee*

**Godels incompleteness theorems paradox does not need a formal proof**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Peter smith is wrong -as are all other mathematicians/logicians PART 2**,*Rupert*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Peter smith is wrong -as are all other mathematicians/logicians PART 2**,*george*

**see me**,*pankaj . itm2010***How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Peter Webb***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Marshall***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Marshall*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*G . Frege***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*G . Frege***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Marshall***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*John Jones***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*Marshall***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*george*

**Re: How can I count a set of numbers if all the numbers are inside the set?**,*William Elliot*

**Peter smith is wrong -as are all other mathematicians/logicians**,*elsiemelsi***A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*Newberry***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*LauLuna**Message not available***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*LauLuna***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*LauLuna***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*aatu . koskensilta*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*Newberry***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*Newberry**Message not available**Message not available***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*Newberry*

**Re: A recursion theoretic look at incompleteness**,*george*

**for technology and invention news www.24hoursnews.blogspot.com**,*careless-caring***How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*MoeBlee***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*mbstevens***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*Bill Taylor***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*translogi***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones*

**Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*John Jones***Re: How does one construct the set of natural numbers?**,*george*

**Peter Smiths book on Godel**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Peter Smiths book on Godel**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Peter Smiths book on Godel**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Peter Smiths book on Godel**,*Marshall*

**Re: Peter Smiths book on Godel**,*george*

**Preferred definition of Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*george***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*John Jones***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*george***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Peter_Smith*

**Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Preferred definition of Logic**,*Peter_Smith*

**Computability theory question**,*Snis Pilbor***Re: Computability theory question**,*Thomas Paetz***Re: Computability theory question**,*Snis Pilbor***Re: Computability theory question**,*Thomas Paetz***Re: Computability theory question**,*Snis Pilbor*

**Second order arithmetic**,*djrt20***Re: Second order arithmetic**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Second order arithmetic**,*Peter_Smith*

**Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*Zaljohar***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*Zaljohar***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*Zaljohar***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*Zaljohar***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*G . Frege***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*Zaljohar***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell paradox solved by infinite multi-layering**,*G . Frege*

**The complete disproof of Godels incompleteness theorem -paradox and invalid axioms**,*elsiemelsi***The indeterminacy of number**,*John Jones***Re: The indeterminacy of number**,*mbstevens***Re: The indeterminacy of number**,*John Jones*

**Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Peter Webb***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Peter Webb***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Peter Webb***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott*

**Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*MoeBlee***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*Scott***Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof**,*george*

**Re: Jack Tuszynski**,*tuszynskijack2***When are fallacies acceptable?**,*David***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*William Elliot***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*herbzet***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*William Elliot***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*herbzet***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*William Elliot***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*herbzet***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*William Elliot*

**Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*LauLuna***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*Peter Webb***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*David***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*David***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*translogi***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*mbstevens***Re: When are fallacies acceptable?**,*Frederick Williams*

**www.24hoursnews.blogspot.com**,*careless-caring***Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*translogi***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*translogi***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Logic and Probability**,*Pierre Asselin***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Pierre Asselin***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Logic and Probability**,*mbstevens***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Logic and Probability**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Logic and Probability**,*translogi***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*translogi***Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna***Re: Logic and Probability**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: Logic and Probability**,*LauLuna*

***** all NIKE.shox.Air max.AF1.TN.Jordan.shoes.Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.com**,*nike shoes***Embedding S5 in K4**,*translogi***proof of GL |- [] A --> [][] A**,*translogi***Godels imcompleteness theorem depends on the axioms of PM- but these axioms are invalid**,*elsiemelsi***why we practice?**,*chahal_singh1980@xxxxxxxxx***God is self-referential**,*BroDavii***Re: God is self-referential**,*herbzet*

**Re: For those who want to see the arguments that Godels incompleteness theorem is invalid**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Cosmological and local geometry**,*John Jones***A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidate Godel**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidate Godel**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that inval**,*elsiemelsi***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that inval**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that inval**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Herman Jurjus***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Peter_Smith***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Newberry***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*MoeBlee***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george***Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*george*

**Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat**,*elsiemelsi*

**is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*elsiemelsi***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*Rupert***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*elsiemelsi***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*elsiemelsi***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*Rupert***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*elsiemelsi***Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*Hamish Reid*

**Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2**,*elsiemelsi*

**Re: Some questions about definitions and axioms.**,*translogi***Mathematicians dont understand Godels incompleteness theorems**,*elsiemelsi***Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Rupert***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Rupert***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Rupert***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Rupert*

**Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*Rupert*

**Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Is Godel lieing when he states this**,*zencycle*

**Re: Godels incompleteness theorems are a complete failure and invali**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels incompleteness theorems are a complete failure and invali**,*Jesse F. Hughes*

**Re: Godels incompleteness theorems are a complete failure and invalid**,*Peter_Smith***sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*William Elliot***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*Keith Ramsay***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*herbzet***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege*

**Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege*

**Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*MoeBlee***Re: sentential logic - curious problem**,*G . Frege*

**evidence on ***philia**,*commander zero rides***Re: evidence on ***philia**,*Frederick Williams***Re: evidence on ***philia**,*commander zero rides*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**evidence on ***philia**,*commander zero rides***evidence on ***philia**,*commander zero rides***Re: evidence on ***philia**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*guyontheinet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*abo***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*abo***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*MoeBlee***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet**Message not available***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*SBCeconomics***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Marshall***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*MoeBlee***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*herbzet*

**Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*george***Re: Countable models of ZFC**,*Rupert*

**Second order inferences**,*LordBeotian***Re: Second order inferences**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Second order inferences**,*LordBeotian***Re: Second order inferences**,*george***Re: Second order inferences**,*LordBeotian***Re: Second order inferences**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Second order inferences**,*george***Re: Second order inferences**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Second order inferences**,*LordBeotian*

**Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness theor**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness theor**,*MoeBlee***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*elsiemelsi***Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness t**,*elsiemelsi*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Godels use of the theory of types makes his incompleteness theor**,*elsiemelsi*

**Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread**,*Scott***Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread**,*george*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread**,*Scott***Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread**,*Scott***Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread**,*george*

**iterative set theory: My version**,*Zaljohar***Re: iterative set theory: My version**,*Zaljohar***Re: iterative set theory: My version**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: iterative set theory: My version**,*Zaljohar*

**Re: omega**,*Allan Adler***[FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web**,*Boris 'pi' Piwinger***Re: Axiom of infinity and the set of all hereditary finite sets.**,*Zaljohar***Re: Axiom of infinity and the set of all hereditary finite sets.**,*Jesse F. Hughes*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Axiom of infinity and the set of all hereditary finite sets.**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Axiom of infinity and the set of all hereditary finite sets.**,*David Libert*

**Re: Godel proves his own incompleteness theorems invalid**,*Jesse F. Hughes***Re: Please critique my set theoretic approach to a classic syllogistic fallacy**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Please critique my set theoretic approach to a classic syllogistic fallacy**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Please critique my set theoretic approach to a classic syllogistic fallacy**,*G . Frege*