Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: Rupert <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:44:46 -0700
On Oct 3, 12:36 am, aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
george wrote:
DMC did say that a standard model had to be well-founded. He did not
say that it had to be transitive. I personally still don't know if it
does or not.
I'm sure you're capable of figuring it out on your own. Just re-read
the posts in this thread.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
It should be noted: when I defined "standard model" I said it didn't
have to be transitive, hence when I say "the intersection of all
standard models is L_alpha where alpha is countable", I should instead
have said "the intersection of all standard transitive models is
L_alpha where alpha is countable".
.
- References:
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: george
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: george
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: is Godel lieing when he states this-part 2
- Next by Date: Re: Axiom of infinity and the set of all hereditary finite sets.
- Previous by thread: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|