Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: herbzet <herbzet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:57:04 -0400
george wrote:
The only thing for which you might need a semantics therefore becomes
"final confirmation of" UNdecidability/independence results.
The obviously better way to get those is just to prove them in
a STRONGER theory.
Ouch! I mean, good point. I mean, interesting thought.
--
hz
.
- References:
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: george
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: Rupert
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- From: george
- Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Next by Date: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Countable models of ZFC
- Index(es):