Re: Linear temporal logic with only past
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:18:33 +0200
Christophe Jacquet schrieb:
Hello,
Gabbay has shown that LTL+Past has no increased expressive power over
LTL (i.e. LTL with future operators only). There even seems to be a
translation algorithm from LTL+Past to "future" LTL.
Looks like in peano arithmetic, where you can defined
predecessor, based on successor.
pred(X)=Y :<=> succ(Y)=X
This can be adapted to some modal expressions. Let
F denote one step in the future, P denote one step
in the past. I assume we have then:
B -> F A <=> F (P B -> A)
So you can move out the F operator. In the end
you will go from:
A to F^n A'
For some n. Now if the time is Z (the positive and negative
integers) then:
|- F^n 'A <=> |- 'A
Because |- makes an universal closure I assume.
Easy...
Bye
.
- References:
- Linear temporal logic with only past
- From: Christophe Jacquet
- Linear temporal logic with only past
- Prev by Date: Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- Next by Date: CFP: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR CRISIS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
- Previous by thread: Linear temporal logic with only past
- Next by thread: A garbage free logic forum?
- Index(es):