Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:54:15 +0200
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:29:49 -0700, Peter_Smith <ps218@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yesterday in an e-mail to "herbzet" I just wrote:
I've mused about this in the past, and the recent spews of garbage
here have made me think of it again.
"The signal-to-noise ratio is just too low, imho."
- referring to sci.logic.
I would appreciate such a place very much. On the other hand, it seems
There is, it seems, a place for (a need for??) something on the net
between the garbage-ridden sci.logic and (say) the FOM (Foundations of
Mathematics) mailing list.
that the number of individuals who are interested in discussing logical
topics (at this "intermediate level") is rather low, no?
I'm not sure if there really is enough demand...
If there is interest, I might look into the practicalities of setting
one up: but what do others think?
Sincerely,
"G. F."
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- From: translogi
- Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- References:
- A garbage free logic forum?
- From: Peter_Smith
- A garbage free logic forum?
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof
- Next by Date: Re: Request for Reviewer/Tutor of Amateur Cardinality Proof
- Previous by thread: Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- Next by thread: Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|