Re: Cantor's definition of set

On 25 Oct, 20:51, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

OK. But if the members of a set have nothing in common, then how can
we have a set of numbers, for numbers are derived from each other -
they have something in common.

Where on earth do you get the idea that the members of a set need have
nothing in common?? Take some set of people: the members of the set
have something in common (being human beings, for a start).

.