Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:31:46 +0100
Jan Burse schrieb:
Peter_Smith schrieb:http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/creating-newsgroups/part1/I've mused about this in the past, and the recent spews of garbageHi all, how about creating sci.logic.ontology?
here have made me think of it again.
There is, it seems, a place for (a need for??) something on the net
between the garbage-ridden sci.logic and (say) the FOM (Foundations of
Mathematics) mailing list. E.g. a moderated forum, with a large enough
group of moderators not to need too much work from any one person to
keep it on track and free of cranks and buffoons.
If there is interest, I might look into the practicalities of setting
one up: but what do others think?
sci.logic suffers in that the quality of postings is
constantly decreasing. sci.logic.ontology could attract
new people from fields related to sci.logic. And it
could also divert people from sci.logic, which do
not find an appropriate forum in sci.logic.
Bye
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- References:
- A garbage free logic forum?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- From: Jan Burse
- A garbage free logic forum?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Next by Date: Re: Is a set object exhaustive?
- Previous by thread: Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- Next by thread: Re: A garbage free logic forum?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|