Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:07:49 +0100
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:37:20 -0000, Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It must be incredible difficult for him! (Reminds me of Plato's beardAnd that's an insurmountable challenge for you, isn't it?
Most definitions seem to rely on being
able to tell left from right.
though. :-)
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: Marshall
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Index(es):