Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:50:11 -0700
On Oct 30, 5:37 pm, "R. Srinivasan" <sradh...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Correction. The last sentence should read "Only propositions provable/
refutable in NPA* are assigned the value true/false;...."
Okay, suppose I say, "I read your paper and now I love NAF!. It's the
only approach to mathematics that makes sense!". Then what do I do?
How do I prove theorems of mathematics? Or do I not prove theorems but
rather I just help you out by telling people how great NAFL is and
that it's the ony approach to mathematics that makes sense?
Signed,
Wants To Be A True NAFLer.
Dubuque, Iowa.
.
- References:
- Non standard models of PA
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: george
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: george
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: Bill Taylor
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: george
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: george
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Non standard models of PA
- Prev by Date: Re: Non standard models of PA
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Previous by thread: Re: Non standard models of PA
- Next by thread: Re: Non standard models of PA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|