Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2007 17:54:04 -0700
On Oct 30, 1:48 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 30, 1:25 pm, John Jones <jonescard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
As I have said, 'order'
relies on a machine, a mathematics, that can tell left from right. Now
how do you propose they can DO THAT!
Our reading and writing of mathematical text.
Anyway, formulas could be conveyed audibly instead of by visual text,
in which case, there'd be no requirement for distinguishing left from
right (there would be a requirement to distinguish now from before,
but so what?) And, so what?, anyway, that reading text requires
knowing left from right?
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- References:
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Prev by Date: Re: Non standard models of PA
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|