Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:13:42 +0100
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:38:07 -0700, John Jones <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Not so. Order CAN be "codified" (or "represented") in mathematics.
While we, ourselves, are able to distinguish between left and right
and before and after, mathematics is not able to distinguish these.
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: Marshall
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- From: John Jones
- Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's definition of set
- Index(es):