sci.logic
- Is it an object? is it a monad? No! its ...,
John Jones
- **Amazing site for Today's knowledge, Information**,
supremestar
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
s3
- Fun with markov chains,
s3
- Monads and Objects,
John Jones
- Need Textbook Recommendation,
ilychy
- How can you prove S5 |-A <==> S4|-<>[]A ?,
translogi
- Infomant Lied To Police and Still Gets $$$$ - Rajni Parmar,
j . roberts . 83
- Inaccessible cardinal.,
Zaljohar
- Something about ACA_0 (and adding truth theories to PA),
Peter_Smith
- I appologise to peter Smith,
elsiemelsi
- decidable fragments of first order logic?,
Marshall
- Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish,
elsiemelsi
- Gödel's sentence is not self-referential,
LauLuna
Re: G�del's sentence is not self-referential,
John Jones
Message not available
Inaccessible cardinals in A-Z class theory.,
Zaljohar
I'm with Turgenev,
Peter_Smith
Rumours about Goedel,
Herman Jurjus
حصريا فيلم معالي الوزير ( احمد زكي - يسرا - لبلبه ) Dvdرابط مباشر,
فواز
My criticism of possible worlds,
John Jones
What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Rupert
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Rupert
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Rupert
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Rupert
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Rupert
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
Zaljohar
- Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?,
LauLuna
Help for a (basic) exercise in model theory,
Ginhead
2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
Frederick Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
Peter_Smith
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
- Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it,
elsiemelsi
Sum-of_Products Negation,
evansstev
pedophilia is ok,
legalize it
Conservativity and CH,
kleptomaniac666_
A Perspective Puzzle,
John Jones
Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
John Jones
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
G . Frege
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
John Jones
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
John Jones
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Marshall
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Jan Burse
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
John Jones
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?,
translogi
What the Earliest Ancient Greek Philosophers Knew About The Meaning of Life,
jennyjenny
J class theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory.,
G . Frege
- Re: J class theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory.,
G . Frege
- Re: J class theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
G . Frege
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
G . Frege
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
G . Frege
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
MoeBlee
- Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.,
Zaljohar
Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?,
John Jones
Modal logic: decidability proof in Blackurn's book,
Eusebius
Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
abo
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
abo
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
abo
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
planetnoob
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
J P
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
J P
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
J P
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
george
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
John Jones
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
Colander
- Re: Eddie's largest number,
J P
What is the color of The Truth ?,
Caesar J. B. Squitti
a question,
Min JIANG
A new theory on Degeneration,
Johnmuthukat
Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
John Jones
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
John Jones
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
John Jones
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
LauLuna
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
herbzet
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
herbzet
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
G . Frege
- Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts,
John Jones
Just another theory.,
Zaljohar
Call For Papers: WORLDCOMP'08, 25 Int'l. Joint Conferences in Comp. Sci., Comp. Eng., and Applied Computing, July 2008, USA,
A. M. G. Solo
Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL,
niburu1
Sara Jay free video clips. Nude movies gallery,
dawd
Just a simple question.,
Zaljohar
Zh set theory with some detail.,
Zaljohar
Hilbert and the properties of the primitives,
John Jones
Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.,
Zaljohar
How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?,
translogi
how to reduce?,
john
On extremal conditions, inspired by the implementable set theory thread,
Aatu Koskensilta
Mantra strings and Countable strings,
John Jones
FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction,
R. Srinivasan
what is wrong with this theory.,
Zaljohar
Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
Marshall
- Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
guyontheinet
- Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
John Jones
- Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....,
Marshall
Beginner question: Basic proof,
Filler
Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
LauLuna
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
LauLuna
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
LauLuna
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
- Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.,
Zaljohar
Ulternative set theory.,
Zaljohar
A strange Schema.,
Zaljohar
Magnetosynthesis,
alanejackson
Nebulous concepts... how to even start on this logic-based project of mine?,
collection60
Re: solution manuals,
ckoyunoglu
Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
kleptomaniac666_
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
MoeBlee
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
kleptomaniac666_
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
MoeBlee
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Frederick Williams
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Bill Taylor
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Bill Taylor
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Frederick Williams
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Bill Taylor
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
kleptomaniac666_
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
translogi
- Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
John Jones
Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic,
Alan Smaill
kissan ATM,
shivarajsahukar
Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Gc
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Gc
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LauLuna
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LauLuna
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
- Message not available
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Peter_Smith
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LordBeotian
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LauLuna
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LauLuna
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
kleptomaniac666_
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
LauLuna
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
abo
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Bill Taylor
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Newberry
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
Anna Ohura free video clips. Nude movies gallery,
ter
Set Theory with Reflection Principles,
LauLuna
Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Newberry
Re: A missing definition in “Gödel's Proof” by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Jan Burse
Zh set theory,
Zaljohar
Zh set theory.,
Zaljohar
Re: Zuhair's set theory: Corrected,
Zaljohar
Re: Proof of a certain theorem in “Gödel's Proof” by Nagel & Newman,
Jan Burse
about Shannon's mistakes,
wangyong
Re: Proof of a certain theorem in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman,
translogi
Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
David C . Ullrich
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Peter_Smith
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
translogi
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Peter_Smith
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Jack Campin - bogus address
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Peter_Smith
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
translogi
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Alan Smaill
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
translogi
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Jan Burse
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "G?del's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Jack Campin - bogus address
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Alan Smaill
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
translogi
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Alan Smaill
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Daryl McCullough
- OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic,
translogi
- Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic,
G . Frege
- Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic,
G . Frege
- Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic,
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Mitch
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
translogi
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Mitch
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
David C . Ullrich
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
David C . Ullrich
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
David C . Ullrich
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Frederick Williams
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
Frederick Williams
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
- Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter),
G . Frege
Re: Cantor's definition of set,
MoeBlee
[FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web,
Boris 'pi' Piwinger
Re: [] dimensions,
William Elliot
Re: what is reification?,
mbstevens
Re: Non standard models of PA,
LauLuna
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
george
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
george
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Nam D. Nguyen
- So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA],
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA],
Bill Taylor
- Re: So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA],
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Marshall
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Marshall
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Marshall
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
george
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
george
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Non standard models of PA,
Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Non standard models of PA,
Herman Jurjus
Re: Non standard models of PA,
James Burns
Re: Non standard models of PA,
george
Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
John Jones
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
MoeBlee
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
John Jones
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
MoeBlee
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
John Jones
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
MoeBlee
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Marshall
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
John Jones
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
george
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
george
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
george
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
G . Frege
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Fuckwit
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Marshall
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
Marshall
- Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness',
John Jones
