sci.logic

• Thread Index

---

• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: MoeBlee
• Is it an object? is it a monad? No! its ...
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: How can you prove S5 |-A <==> S4|-<>[]A ?
  • From: translogi
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: thinker
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• **Amazing site for Today's knowledge, Information**
  • From: supremestar
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: p . rajeeev . p
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: s3
• Fun with markov chains
  • From: s3
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: thinker
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: John Jones
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: thinker
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: thinker
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: thinker
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Jack Campin - bogus address
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: herbzet
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Monads and Objects
  • From: Marshall
• Monads and Objects
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: How can you prove S5 |-A <==> S4|-<>[]A ?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: translogi
• Re: Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Need Textbook Recommendation
  • From: ilychy
• How can you prove S5 |-A <==> S4|-<>[]A ?
  • From: translogi
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Infomant Lied To Police and Still Gets $$$$ - Rajni Parmar
  • From: j . roberts . 83
• Re: Inaccessible cardinals in A-Z class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Inaccessible cardinal.
  • From: Newberry
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: Inaccessible cardinal.
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Inaccessible cardinal.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Charles
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Inaccessible cardinal.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: G�del's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: G�del's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Something about ACA_0 (and adding truth theories to PA)
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: I appologise to peter Smith
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: herbzet
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: herbzet
• I appologise to peter Smith
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Peter Smith says things that are over elsiemelsi's head
  • From: Marshall
• decidable fragments of first order logic?
  • From: Marshall
• Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Marshall
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: george
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: george
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Gödel's sentence is not self-referential
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: herbzet
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: abo
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: I'm with Turgenev
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Inaccessible cardinals in A-Z class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• I'm with Turgenev
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Newberry
• Re: pedophilia is ok
  • From: legalize it
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Marshall
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Help for a (basic) exercise in model theory
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Rumours about Goedel
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: LauLuna
• Rumours about Goedel
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidate
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidate
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Marshall
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• حصريا فيلم معالي الوزير ( احمد زكي - يسرا - لبلبه ) Dvdرابط مباشر
  • From: فواز
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: Peter_Smith
• My criticism of possible worlds
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• What is the Size of V in this theory?
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: pedophilia is ok
  • From: Einstein
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Help for a (basic) exercise in model theory
  • From: Ginhead
• Re: Help for a (basic) exercise in model theory
  • From: Ginhead
• Re: Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?
  • From: translogi
• Help for a (basic) exercise in model theory
  • From: Ginhead
• Re: Sum-of_Products Negation
  • From: translogi
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Marshall
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: J P
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?
  • From: translogi
• Sum-of_Products Negation
  • From: evansstev
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: John Jones
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• pedophilia is ok
  • From: legalize it
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: translogi
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory with comprehension corrected.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Conservativity and CH
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: Colander
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Conservativity and CH
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: John Jones
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: mbstevens
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: John Jones
• A Perspective Puzzle
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Are modern logics Aristotelian?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: a question
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: translogi
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: What the Earliest Ancient Greek Philosophers Knew About The Meaning of Life
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: What the Earliest Ancient Greek Philosophers Knew About The Meaning of Life
  • From: collection60
• What the Earliest Ancient Greek Philosophers Knew About The Meaning of Life
  • From: jennyjenny
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: a question
  • From: Min JIANG
• Re: What is the color of The Truth ?
  • From: planetnoob
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: planetnoob
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: J class theory.
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: MoeBlee
• J class theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Can there be Possible Problems for the idea of Possible Worlds?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: abo
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: a question
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Modal logic: decidability proof in Blackurn's book
  • From: Eusebius
• Re: Eddie's largest number
  • From: abo
• Eddie's largest number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: What is the color of The Truth ?
  • From: William Elliot
• What is the color of The Truth ?
  • From: Caesar J. B. Squitti
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: luis . nakamura
• a question
  • From: Min JIANG
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: William Elliot
• A new theory on Degeneration
  • From: Johnmuthukat
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Fuzzy or Extensible? On ill-defined Concepts
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: translogi
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: Charles
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Just another theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Zh set theory with some detail.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA]
  • From: Nam D. Nguyen
• Call For Papers: WORLDCOMP'08, 25 Int'l. Joint Conferences in Comp. Sci., Comp. Eng., and Applied Computing, July 2008, USA
  • From: A. M. G. Solo
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: guyontheinet
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: Charles
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: niburu1
• Re: Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Decidability of monadic fragment of FOL
  • From: niburu1
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Sara Jay free video clips. Nude movies gallery
  • From: dawd
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory with some detail.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Zh set theory with some detail.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Just a simple question.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Just a simple question.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory with some detail.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Zh set theory with some detail.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: guyontheinet
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: John Jones
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Hilbert and the properties of the primitives
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Hilbert and the properties of the primitives
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Hilbert and the properties of the primitives
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA]
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Zh(i) Set Theory : Versions and some Details.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: george
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: george
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: george
• Re: How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• How does ZFC proof that PA is consistent?
  • From: translogi
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: translogi
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LordBeotian
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: MoeBlee
• how to reduce?
  • From: john
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: On extremal conditions, inspired by the implementable set theory thread
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: On extremal conditions, inspired by the implementable set theory thread
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: Filler
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Marshall
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• On extremal conditions, inspired by the implementable set theory thread
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: translogi
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: guyontheinet
• Mantra strings and Countable strings
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• FOL/Intuitionistic logic versus NAFL. Part 1. Failure of non-contradiction
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Marshall
• Re: what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Bill Taylor
• what is wrong with this theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Conbra
• Oh, on second thoughts, what the heck ....
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: lohchanyee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Beginner question: Basic proof
  • From: Filler
• Re: Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Ulternative set theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Zh-iterative set Theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Ulternative set theory.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Ulternative set theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Ulternative set theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Ulternative set theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: A strange Schema.
  • From: MoeBlee
• A strange Schema.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Magnetosynthesis
  • From: alanejackson
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Nebulous concepts... how to even start on this logic-based project of mine?
  • From: collection60
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: translogi
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: abo
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Gc
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: aatu . koskensilta
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: guyontheinet
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Gc
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: guyontheinet
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Nebulous concepts... how to even start on this logic-based project of mine?
  • From: G . Frege
• Nebulous concepts... how to even start on this logic-based project of mine?
  • From: collection60
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: translogi
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: ckoyunoglu
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: ckoyunoglu
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: ckoyunoglu
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: solution manuals
  • From: ckoyunoglu
• Re: Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: MoeBlee
• Intuitionistic Arithmetic
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: kleptomaniac666_
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: george
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• kissan ATM
  • From: shivarajsahukar
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Gc
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Gc
• Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Torkel Franzen on truth
  • From: Newberry
• Anna Ohura free video clips. Nude movies gallery
  • From: ter
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• OOPS was wrong indeed. ~~ (A v ~A) is a theorem in intuitionistic logic
  • From: translogi
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: aatu . koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: aatu . koskensilta
• Re: Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: [] dimensions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: [] dimensions
  • From: kunzmilan
• [] dimensions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• So long sci.logic . [Prev: Non standard models of PA]
  • From: Nam D. Nguyen
• Re: Cantor's definition of set
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: James Burns
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: A missing definition in “Gödel's Proof” by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: MoeBlee
• Set Theory with Reflection Principles
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Proof of a certain theorem in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: george
• Re: Proof of a certain theorem in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman
  • From: David Auerbach
• Re: Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: george
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: george
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: george
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: george
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: [] dimensions
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Newberry
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Mitch
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Nam D. Nguyen
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Nam D. Nguyen
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Fuckwit
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Godel and Kant, and 'incompleteness'
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: A missing definition in “Gödel's Proof” by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: A missing definition in “Gödel's Proof” by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: [] dimensions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Zh set theory
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's definition of set
  • From: John Jones
• Re: A missing definition in "G?del's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: Jack Campin - bogus address
• Zh set theory.
  • From: Zaljohar
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Non standard models of PA
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: A missing definition in "Gödel's Proof" by Nagel & Newman (open letter)
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: A missing definition in &q