Re: I appologise to peter Smith
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:09:36 +0100
elsiemelsi schrieb:
> Thus godels notation does not mean what it looks like but has to be
> decifered first to get it true meaning
I wonder what an ambigous sentence "looks like" and
how you can extract its meaning by sniffing on the surface?
You have always to use your brains when you read a text.
There is no difference to math than to any other text,
except that you can take courses on math.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity#Physics_and_mathematics
.
- References:
- I appologise to peter Smith
- From: elsiemelsi
- I appologise to peter Smith
- Prev by Date: Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- Next by Date: Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
- Previous by thread: I appologise to peter Smith
- Index(es):