Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- From: Frederick Williams <"Frederick Williams"@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:15:48 GMT
herbzet wrote:
Marshall wrote:
As I understand it, first order logic in general is not decidable.
However various fragments of FOL are decidable. There's a
decision procedure if all predicates have arity 1, for example.
Are there other fragments of FOL that are decidable?
Are the limits of decidable fragments known? Which
raises the question for me of whether it might be possible
to characterize the "size" of a decidable fragment, and
then ask what the "largest" such fragment might be.
Answers, discussion, and/or pointers to further reading welcome.
Marshall
"Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem" by W. Ackermann
North-Holland Publishing Company [1954]
is an older work on the subject.
And "The Classical Decision Problem" by B Borger, B Gradel and Y
Gurevich, Springer-Verlag is a newer one.
--
How unlike the home life of our own dear Queen.
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- From: herbzet
- Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- References:
- decidable fragments of first order logic?
- From: Marshall
- Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- From: herbzet
- decidable fragments of first order logic?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2 impredicative statements in Godels theorem that invalidates it
- Next by Date: Re: Peter Smith says Godel is rubbish
- Previous by thread: Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- Next by thread: Re: decidable fragments of first order logic?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|