Re: Monads and Objects
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:16:45 +0100
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:56:30 -0800 (PST), Marshall
<marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Or rather with our notions of "one" and "no" ...Whether it is or it isn't in conflict with out notion of "object" it's
A universe [with] one object is a universe of no objects. This is not in
conflict with our blanket notion of 'object'.
certainly in conflict with our notion of "one."
One would think so (at least any sane person, I guess).You said there were three objects. Saying there is only a andThere is only a and b.A distinction is something that is a property of a unique pair
A universe with three objects has two distinctions.
of objects. In a universe with three objects, we have the distinctions
between (a, b), (b, c), and (a, c). So a universe with three
objects has three distinctions.
b conflicts with that. If there was only a and b that would be
two objects [if a =/= b].
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Monads and Objects
- From: John Jones
- Re: Monads and Objects
- From: Marshall
- Re: Monads and Objects
- From: John Jones
- Re: Monads and Objects
- From: Marshall
- Monads and Objects
- Prev by Date: Re: Monads and Objects
- Next by Date: Re: Rumours about Goedel
- Previous by thread: Re: Monads and Objects
- Next by thread: Re: Monads and Objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|