Re: Technical Animism
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:05:39 +0100
John Jones schrieb:
On Dec 4, 12:46�pm, Tommi H�yn�l�nmaa <tommi.hoynalan...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Tommi H�yn�l�nmaa kirjoitti:
John Jones kirjoitti:Some complex systems can develop intelligence. This is related toBut with that definition, a structure is complex enough only if it isJust wrong words. Of course, all complex systems are not intelligent.
intelligent, and is intelligent only if it is complex enough...
transformation of quantity into quality (or to emergence).
--
Tommi H�yn�l�nmaa
s�hk�posti / e-mail: tommi.hoynalan...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
kotisivu / homepage:http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/
This only displaces the problem of how to identify intelligent
properties in structures. I now have to look for emergent properties
in structures. I have no conceivable means of accomplishing either
task, nor even of identifying it as a bona fide task.
You can compare a system without intelligence/emergence with a
system with intelligence/emergence (substance) versus their the
performance of a certain task (accidence). (see pears/apples thread)
Intelligence/emergence should help in performing this certain tasks.
Intelligence has a more central conotation of a directing instance.
Emergence has a more distributive conotation of a global property.
Nothing special about it. Anybody will be able for example to
decide between an intelligent and an unintelligent elevator. It currently happens that I live in a building with a very
annoying elevator, it to catapult sometime directly into the 5th
floor when I want to get into the 2th floor.
But don't worry, I don't talk (yet) to the elevator.
Best Regards
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: John Jones
- Re: Technical Animism
- References:
- Technical Animism
- From: John Jones
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: Tommi Höynälänmaa
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: John Jones
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: Tommi Höynälänmaa
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: Tommi Höynälänmaa
- Re: Technical Animism
- From: John Jones
- Technical Animism
- Prev by Date: Re: Technical Animism
- Next by Date: Re: Enderton problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Technical Animism
- Next by thread: Re: Technical Animism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|