Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:50:47 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 18, 2:59 pm, "Nam D. Nguyen" <namducngu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
A model
*always already* includes a *chosen* interpretation: hence a belief has been
"believed" already.
A model is a mathematical object. I don't know how you would argue
that a model requires "a belief has been "believed" already".
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- References:
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: tchow
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: tchow
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- Prev by Date: Re: A type theory with a universal set in it.
- Next by Date: Re: set theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- Next by thread: Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
- Index(es):