Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:21:32 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 26, 7:18 am, Gene Ledbetter <ledbetterg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 24, 3:11 pm, Newberry <newberr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let P be the sentence "This sentence is meaningless." Is it true or
false? It should not be difficult to answer. Tractatus Logico-
Philosophicus says: "In order to tell whether a picture is true or
false we compare it with reality." [2.223]
When someone says to you, "This sentence is ...", you should stop him
and ask, "What sentence are you referring to?"
Interrupting someone mid sentence is rude. I cannot endorse
your approach.
No sentence exists. A sentence will not exist until one has been
completed. You cannot evaluate the meaningfulness of an unstated
statement.
If you'd just let the guy finish talking, you'd have a stated
sentence to evaluate. Your critique only applies for as long
as it takes the guy to reach the end of the sentence.
Marshall
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- References:
- The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Newberry
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Gene Ledbetter
- The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: Learning Greek Inference using a BASIC STAMP Computer Memory Aid
- Next by Date: Re: Learning Greek Inference using a BASIC STAMP Computer Memory Aid
- Previous by thread: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|