Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: djrt20@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:40:48 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 29, 10:33 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 25, 5:42 pm, djr...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Meaninglessness is when a statement is grammatically incorrect, like
"2++exp(+)=8". It is a concept that can be applied to mathematical
statements.
Hmmm. Do you mean to imply that every syntactically well-formed
mathematical expression is meaningful? What is the meaning of
1/0?
Marshall
Yes, or at least statements in elementary number theory, for example
(I don't wish to get into a debate about the continuum hypothesis).
The statement "1/0" is not syntactically correct.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Marshall
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- References:
- The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Newberry
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Newberry
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: herbzet
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Newberry
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: djrt20
- Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- From: Marshall
- The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Next by Date: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Previous by thread: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.
- Index(es):