Re: THE METAPHYSICAL SCIENCE OF RELIGION - why this is relevant to sci.logic

On Dec 30, 5:09 pm, pjmutn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 30, 1:03 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 30, 12:11 pm, pjmutn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The following IS relevant to sci.logic because it treats religion as a
logical system of symbols such as the names of G-D. This material is
not proselytizing for one particular religion, nor is it focussed on
actual religious expience. Rather, it looks at the phenomenon of
religion and attempts to discern a logical system in the ideas that
have developed around the religious experience.

Nope. That's not logic. That's religion. Off topic here.

That is just your opinion.

It is a statement of fact.


I am a genius and an orginal thinker.

I freely concede you are an original thinker.

What reason do I have for believing your assertion that
you are a genius?


You cannot judge me.

I'm pretty sure I already have.


I read the first few paragraphs and scanned the rest. I saw nothing
to interest me, and nothing even remotely related to mathematical
logic.

This is not mathematical logic, but sci.logic, i.e. logic of science
or something to that effect.

"Something to that effect" eh?


But more importantly, you think your opinion entitles you to assault
me and assassinate my character and participate in a hate campaign
against me.

I've said you're off-topic, and that your writings don't interest me.
You are, and they don't. Neither of these statements of fact
constitute any of the things you've characterized them as.


It doesn't. You are an egomaniacal redneck.

I'm just curious: what do you think the word "redneck" means?


The only thing that caught my eye was where you call Jesus by the
Kryptonian name for Superman, and the Father by the
Kryptonian name for Superman's father. What is up with that?

Until you read it in context, I will not humor you with an answer.

I *did* read it in context. Where else could I have read it?

Just checking, but you do know that Superman is a comic
book character, right? Blue tights, red cape, able to leap
tall buildings in a single bound? You know he's not mentioned
anywhere in the book of Isaiah, right? That's someone else
they're talking about.


Marshall
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: THE METAPHYSICAL SCIENCE OF RELIGION - why this is relevant to sci.logic
    ... logical system of symbols such as the names of G-D. ... not proselytizing for one particular religion, ... You are an egomaniacal redneck. ... Have you checked to see what your rating is yet? ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: THE METAPHYSICAL SCIENCE OF RELIGION - why this is relevant to sci.logic
    ... logical system of symbols such as the names of G-D. ... not proselytizing for one particular religion, ... Kryptonian name for Superman's father. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: "Balls!!!", said Gus Webb.
    ... I haven't studied her life or philosophy at all myself, ... religion was not really my main focus and it definitely ... felt the Roark character was way too unbelievable. ... other very interesting designs. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: Good topic of conversation
    ... >You write the truth, Robert. ... Religion is only ONE of many>factors ... we" when in self defence mode, ... in defence of his character. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: Definition of "frum" :-)
    ... Too bad there is no independent historical evidence that *Jesus* ever ... The Talmud has lots of such evidence. ... possible that some or other religion might have used the name of this ... character in some of their myths, it's also possible that they didn't. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)