sci.logic
- Re: The problem of action,
Jan Burse
- Toposes and Proper Classes,
Mattias Wikstrom
- FOL vs 2OL,
Bill Taylor
- Proven godel used invalid axiom AR thus his ttheorm invalid,
elsiemelsi
- Satisfiablility and CNF,
herbzet
- Hilbert is back..,
m31
- LaTeX and FOL,
Zaljohar
- LTL vs. CTL,
sasha mal
- What's the weakest metatheory in which Goedel's theorem can be proved?,
Rupert
- Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
LauLuna
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
MoeBlee
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Jan Burse
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Jan Burse
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Jan Burse
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Jan Burse
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
Jan Burse
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom,
MoeBlee
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,,
Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and,
elsiemelsi
- Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statm,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
janburse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s,
Jan Burse
- Heap-Set Theory H-S,
Zaljohar
- Inequality Question,
Sundus
- The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
MoeBlee
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
G . Frege
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
herbzet
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Gc
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Gc
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
MoeBlee
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
G . Frege
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
G . Frege
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
G . Frege
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
Jan Burse
- Re: The Skolem paradox destroys the incompleteness of ZFC,
elsiemelsi
- Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
MoeBlee
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
lwalke3
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Gc
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Gc
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Gc
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Gc
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
WM
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
MoeBlee
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
MoeBlee
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta,
LauLuna
- Order and Disorder in Sign Strings,
John Jones
- Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version of PM and is thus invalid,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version of PM and is thus invalid,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version of PM and is thus invalid,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
herbzet
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Jan Burse
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
MoeBlee
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
MoeBlee
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
MoeBlee
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
MoeBlee
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version of PM and is thus invalid,
Colin
- Godel uses the axiom of reducibilty in his incompleteness theorem which makes it invalid,
elsiemelsi
- adjective noun predicate,
Keenlearner
Understanding statements without sense,
John Jones
questions,
gane1064
Download free Projects,
TechGuru
Language,
John Jones
The proof of the inconsistency of UST,
Zaljohar
- Message not available
- Message not available
tautology, logical implication & equivalent,
Jimmy
Conventional terms for the following: "contributing causes," "collective motivators," fallacy of (A => B) => (~A => ~B)?,
Scott H
البرنامج الاسطوري الذي ادهش الملايين !! فقط ضع صورتك ويعطيك شكلك بعد 40 سنه,
فواز
jobs,
dker1bear
Loop,
Zaljohar
Godel AND Rosser in one easy step,
Charlie-Boo
Request for Review/Tutorage for Amateur Proofs,
Scott
Does logic show us all the possibilities of object presentation?,
John Jones
Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
smn
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
george
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Peter Webb
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Peter Webb
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Peter Webb
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.,
george
Research on Gmail,
Sampath Ranganathan
Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
thoughtlessly101
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Fuckwit
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Fuckwit
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
thoughtlessly101
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
thoughtlessly101
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
herbzet
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
herbzet
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
herbzet
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
herbzet
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
David C . Ullrich
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
george
- Re: Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield,
Gc
unsatisfiable 3SAT puzzle,
translogi
The logic of the priviliged binary,
John Jones
Type theory and UST,
Zaljohar
Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Chris Menzel
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
george
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
george
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
george
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
Jan Burse
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
george
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
Jan Burse
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
george
- Re: since AK was reviewing Enderton's article,,
Jan Burse
- "structure" or "interpretation" as opposed to "model",
george
- why is conventional wisdom acceptable?,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Herman Jurjus
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
george
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
Jan Burse
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
- Re: Second-order and Higher-order Logic,
William Elliot
Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Gc
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Marshall
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Gc
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Gc
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Gc
- Re: Re :The empty set,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
R. Srinivasan
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
george
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
george
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
apoorv
- Re: Re :The empty set,
G . Frege
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
- Re: Re :The empty set,
MoeBlee
Final call for papers,
john
Zal's Last Theory,
William Elliot
Type Theory 2: TT2,
Zaljohar
ZF like theory with a universal set of all sets.,
Zaljohar
Set Size theory.,
Zaljohar
Frege function and variable,
John Jones
Re: ... The Gift of Power, Discovery of DIVINE Creation!,
MTwain
PA-models and Gödel's Incompleteness,
LauLuna
Three types of object,
John Jones
testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
Peter_Smith
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
translogi
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
Frederick Williams
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
herbzet
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
LauLuna
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
LauLuna
- Re: testing for equi- satisfaliability,
Jan Burse
Crisis in mathematics,
elsiemelsi
What is the size of X ?,
Zaljohar
Testing wffs for equivalency,
un student
CFP - The 1st International Workshop on Bit-Precise Reasoning (BPR 2008),
bit.precise.reasoning@xxxxxxxxx
conservative extensions in higher-order logic,
Jan-Georg Smaus
Question about Life.,
socratus
tv,
himana
Re: What Is a Variable?,
Frederick Williams
Current Standard Theor of Logic is,
M_SHIRAISHI
Current Theory of Logic is ．．．,
M_SHIRAISHI
Curent Theory of Logic is utterly mistaken !,
M_SHIRAISHI
Technique and Foundation,
John Jones
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Jan Burse
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
herbzet
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
J P
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
herbzet
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Charlie33
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
John Jones
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Jan Burse
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
John Jones
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Jan Burse
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Jan Burse
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
John Jones
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Jan Burse
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Charlie33
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
John Jones
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Charlie33
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Charlie33
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
Charlie33
- Re: Technique and Foundation,
herbzet
What's the name of this fallacy?,
olingaa@xxxxxxxxx
Ackermann's class theory and The Wikipedia,
Zaljohar
My last theory.,
Zaljohar
Re: Countable models of ZFC,
Alan Smaill
Re: A simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidat,
Alan Smaill
Proof and entailment,
myname
- Re: Proof and entailment,
MoeBlee
- Re: Proof and entailment,
G . Frege
- Re: Proof and entailment,
LauLuna
- Re: Proof and entailment,
G . Frege
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
Frederick Williams
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
G . Frege
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
george
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
Peter_Smith
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
george
- Re: Proof and entailment,
MoeBlee
- Re: Proof and entailment,
G . Frege
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
MoeBlee
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
MoeBlee
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
LauLuna
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
LauLuna
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Proof and entailment,
herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment,
G . Frege
Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?,
Frederick Williams
Puzzled about ZFC and transfinite induction,
LordBeotian
Re: Dual Set Theory.,
lwalke3
Re: adverb in FIRST ORDER LOGIC,
G . Frege
ILLC Research Reports and Technical Notes 2007,
Marco Vervoort
Re: Is Reductio Required for PA?,
MoeBlee
Impredicativity,
kleptomaniac666_
Definitions of sets of integers,
kleptomaniac666_
Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
Scott
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
george
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
george
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
george
- Re: Question regarding Dedekind-infinite sets and consistency.,
MoeBlee
Re: k set theory,
MoeBlee
Re: Christmass theory.,
Zaljohar
Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
LauLuna
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
Zaljohar
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
G . Frege
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
MoeBlee
- Re: Russell's paradox and ZF(C),
george
Who Cares if a System is Inconsistent or Incomplete or Any of that Stuff?,
Charlie-Boo
Re: Heap Theory,
Zaljohar
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Has_BS_Anand_Refuted_G=F6del's_Theorem??=,
LauLuna
Re: New kSAT Reduction System,
translogi
Cyclical comprehension schema,
Zaljohar
Got Hope?,
Christian Believer
Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
herbzet
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
MoeBlee
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
Alan Smaill
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth,
kleptomaniac666_
Re: Bigg