Re: Torkel Franzen on truth

From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:14:41 GMT

On 2007-12-30, in sci.logic, george wrote:

This is a classic example of what I previously meant
by disagreement with my allegedly idiosyncratic&bizarre
opinons being, factually, neither coherent nor (therefore)
possible.

Bah. We could with equal justification, and equally arbitrarily, claim that
"the completeness theorem is fundamentally a proof that first-order syntactic
deduction SIMPLY DOESN'T EXIST".

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  - From: george
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
  - From: george

Prev by Date: Re: T-relevant logic
Next by Date: Got Hope?
Previous by thread: Re: Biggest maths fraud in history
Next by thread: Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread