Re: The fallacy of strengthened liar's paradox.

Newberry says...

On Dec 31, 8:57=A0am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
But it is not. You made this substitution:
57': "Sentence number 42 is not true"[56] is not true.

I made this substitution:
56'. "Sentence number 42 is not true"[42] is not true.

You did not. You wrote:

56': "Sentence number 42 is not true" is not true.

I wrote:

57': "Sentence number 42 is not true" is not true.

They are the *same* sentence. Any claim that 56'
is true, while 57' is false is just too ridiculous
to continue to discuss.

--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY

.