Re: Proof and entailment
- From: Frederick Williams <"Frederick Williams"@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:49:48 GMT
myname wrote:
I didn't feel like saying "proof" and "entailment" are the same thing,
so I reached the conclusions I gave you in my first post
("proof" is the goal, "entailment" is the way...)
No, not in sci.logic anyway. If you can find a paper by Tarski called
Truth and Proof, read it. Was it published in Scientific American?
Someone here will know.
--
How unlike the home life of our own dear Queen.
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proof and entailment
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Proof and entailment
- References:
- Proof and entailment
- From: myname
- Re: Proof and entailment
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Proof and entailment
- From: herbzet
- Re: Proof and entailment
- From: myname
- Proof and entailment
- Prev by Date: Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- Next by Date: Re: Proof and entailment
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof and entailment
- Next by thread: Re: Proof and entailment
- Index(es):