Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- From: Frederick Williams <"Frederick Williams"@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:38:55 GMT
herbzet wrote:
Frederick Williams wrote:
herbzet wrote:
John Jones wrote:
Oy.
Take the logical proposition:
As GF points out, it's not an especially logical proposition. What
would a non-logical proposition look like?
John loves Mary
Here, John and Mary are distinguished by the function 'loves'. 'Loves'
distinguishes John and Mary.
Again, as GF says, "loves" is not a function.
Ironically, the real Frege would say that loves is a function.
I'm surprised to hear that! How so?
X loves Y is a function from the set of pairs of objects to the set of
truth values.
--
How unlike the home life of our own dear Queen.
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- References:
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof and entailment
- Next by Date: Re: Proof and entailment
- Previous by thread: Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- Next by thread: Re: Function and Variable: fatal problem?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|