Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:07:16 +0100
elsiemelsi schrieb:
It seems that the vicious circle principle [: : : ]
applies only if the entities involved are constructed by ourselves. In
this case there must clearly exist a definition (namely the description
of the construction) which does not refer to a totality to which the
object defined belongs,
this just repeats what russell said
'Whatever involves all of a collection must not be one of the
collection.'
Put otherwise, if to define a collection of objects one must use the
total
collection itself, then the definition is meaningless. This explanation
given by Russell in 1905 was accepted by Poincare' in 1906, who coined
the
term impredicative definition, (Kline's "Mathematics: The Loss of
Certainty"
*** off.
You didn't cite the whole Gödel again.
.
- References:
- Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: elsiemelsi
- Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Godels incompleteness theorem was not just about a version o
- Next by Date: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Previous by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Next by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Index(es):