Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statm
- From: "elsiemelsi" <cyprinsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:00:54 -0600
The axiom of reducibility draws attention to the
problematic status of impredicative definitions. To quote Weyl 1946,
as it is another example colin leslie dean cliams makes godel invalid as
godel state himself that he constructs impredicative statements- which
text books on logic say are invalid and your quote shows are a problem
and
make his theorem invalid
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Next by Date: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Previous by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Next by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Index(es):