Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:54:57 GMT
On 2008-01-29, in sci.logic, Rupert wrote:
I think he's just saying, Russell conceded that the logicist project
failed, but you don't need to vindicate logicism to justify
mathematics.
Quite so.
Aatu certainly expressed no view himself about whether the axiom of
reducibility is justified. For all I know he may not think this
question is meaningful, he may be a mathematical antirealist.
Regardless of what stance one takes on mathematical realism, it is
certainly a meaningful question whether the axiom of reducibility is
justified on Russell's conception of propositional functions. As it
happens I think it's not only unjustified but patently false, on most
reasonable reconstructions of that conceptions.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- From: Rupert
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- References:
- Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- From: Rupert
- Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica, and the reducibility axiom
- Prev by Date: Re: Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.
- Next by Date: Re: Some answers to Aatu Koskensilta
- Previous by thread: Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- Next by thread: Re: Gödel's system P, Principia Mathematica,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|