Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: "elsiemelsi" <cyprinsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:04:52 -0600
Before Goedel worked on the incompletness theorem.
He published his completness theorem. Which states
for certain systems of syntax and semantic, that
syntax and semantic is essentially the same
so hows that fit with
TWAN LAAN, AND ROB NEDERPELT
Nowadays* we would consider the use of the Vicious
Circle Principle too strict. We consider the
impredicative de�nition of f as a matter of syntax,
whilst the existence of the object f has to do with
semantics. The fact that we are not able to give a
predicative de�nition of f does not imply that such
an object does not exist. Here we must remark that
Russell and Whitehead did not make a distinction between
syntax and semantics in the Principia. Therefore they
had to interpret the Vicious Circle Principle in
the strict way above.
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- References:
- Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: janburse
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- From: Jan Burse
- Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative statments invalidates his theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- Next by Date: Satisfiablility and CNF
- Previous by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Next by thread: Re: Jan Burse gives support that godels use of impredicative s
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|