Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:51:13 +0100
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:24:56 -0800 (PST), Zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Great. :-)
I think that G. Frege's symbol [ ] will be do the job nicely.
Thanks.
So after giving it some thought I think he is right.
You may be right. Especially in your system where you are dealing with
On a second thought I think that @ makes a bitter symbol then c
for part hood.
so x @ y means x is a part of y.
sets AND heaps. Since here "c" also would denote the set theoretic
/subset relation/. Which is not the same as /parthood/ (for heaps).
Though "c" would still make sense in a _pure_ theory of heaps, imho.
Exactly! :-)
the reason is because the symbol c will be confused with
subsethood.
Agree. And looks fine in ASCII too. No?
So it is better to use @ I guess!
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- From: Zaljohar
- Heap-Set Theory H-S
- Prev by Date: Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- Previous by thread: Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- Next by thread: Re: Heap-Set Theory H-S
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|