Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: "elsiemelsi" <cyprinsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:54:40 -0600
obviously there was a set of all ordinals in Burali-fortis day as they came
up with the paradox did canto accept such a set
In Russells day there was a set of all sets
which destroyed naive set theory
so to avoid it set theory just introduced an axiom
Axiom schema of specification
which wiki says
"The restriction to z is necessary to avoid Russell's paradox and its
variants. "
so was there a set of all sets which has just been dissalowed due to an
ad hoc axiom
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- References:
- is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: reasterly
- is there a set of all ordinals
- Prev by Date: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by Date: Mathematics is nothing but an ad hoc discipline
- Previous by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|