Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:37:06 -0800 (PST)
MoeBlee wrote:
Cantor did take certain collections (or whatever German word he
used), such as the set of all sets and its cardinality (if I recall
correctly) to be "inconsistent entities" (or some expression like
that), but I don't know whether a set of all ordinals was one of
them.
For Cantor, the totality of ordinals was the prototypical inconsistent
multiplicity.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- References:
- is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: MoeBlee
- is there a set of all ordinals
- Prev by Date: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by Date: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Previous by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Index(es):