Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:41:12 -0800 (PST)
elsiemelsi wrote:
you must first demonstrate that reality is consistent in the first place
The expression "reality is consistent" -- or "reality is inconsistent"
for that matter -- doesn't mean anything in particular.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- References:
- is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- From: elsiemelsi
- is there a set of all ordinals
- Prev by Date: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by Date: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Previous by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Next by thread: Re: is there a set of all ordinals
- Index(es):