Re: Request for Review/Tutorage of Amateur Proofs

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:45:42 +0100, G. Frege <nomail@invalid> wrote:

Ooops... typos. Should read:


On a quick glance, that seems right to me.

Think so too. But of course, the condition /finite(x)/ would make
such a counterexample impossible. ~~~



F.

--

E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.