Restrictable Primitives?
- From: Zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
In a previous discussion, I came to know that if one add a primitive
one place function symbole F to FOL with identity , then the following
becomes a theorem:
Ax Ey ( y=F(x) )
Three questions:-
First: What is the prove of that?
Second: can we adopt a methodology to restrict that? I mean to
restrict F from ranging over all variables of the language, in such a
manner that for a specific formula Phi :
Ax (Ey(y=F(x)) iff Phi(x))?
I mean can we have another kind of primive concepts , like a
'restrictable primitive function symbole', such that when we say that
F is a restrictable primitive function symbole by Phi , then this
leads to:
Ax (Ey(y=F(x)) iff Phi(x))
Of course if Phi(x) <-> x=x , it is clear that F becomes unrestricted.
Is that possible?
Third: to generalize matters, if such restrictions are possible, then
can this be generalized over other kinds of primitives?
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Restrictable Primitives?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Restrictable Primitives?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Restrictable Primitives?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Restrictable Primitives?
- Prev by Date: Re: Equal Sets and Identical Sets
- Next by Date: Re: Godel did not destroy the Hilbert Frege Russell programme
- Previous by thread: Is there a conspiricy over godel or are you all just dumb
- Next by thread: Re: Restrictable Primitives?
- Index(es):
Loading