Re: Flat sets.
- From: Zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 8, 9:08 pm, Zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Flat Set Theory:
Language: First order logic with identity
Primitives: =,in,[],card
'[]' to symbolize ordered pair, is a primitive two place function
symbol.
'card' is a primitive one place function symbol, and it symblizes
'cardinality'.
Syntax: LaTeX skimmed notation.
Definition:
x is atomic iff (for all y (y in x implies y=x) and exists y (y in
x))
1. Axiom of Extensionality: for all z (z in x iff z in y) implies
x=y
Define:
x is singleton iff exists y (y in x and
not exists z (z in x and z neq y))
2.Axiom of Singletons: x is singleton iff x is atomic
3.Axiom of Flatness: y in x implies y is atomic
4.Axiom schema of Comprehension: If P is a formula in which
x is not free, then all closures of
exists x, for all y (y in x iff (y is atomic and P(y)))
are axioms.
5.Axiom of Ordered pairs: [x,y]=[z,u] iff (x=z and y=u)
Define: z #1 [x,y] iff z=x
Define: z #2 [x,y] iff z=y
were # is read as 'dimension'
so 'x #1 [x,y]' is read as 'x is the first dimension of [x,y]'
6.Axiom of atomicity of ordered pairs: [x,y] is atomic
7.Axiom of Infinity: [x,y] implies (x neq [x,y] and y neq [x,y])
8.Axiom of atomicity of Cardinals: card(x) is atomic
Definitions: x equinumerous y iff exists f (f:x to y, f is
bijective)
x subnumerous_to y iff for all f (f:x to y, f is
strictly injective)
x supernumerous_to y iff y subnumerous_to x
9.Axiom of cardinal equality:
card(x) = card(y) iff x equinumerous y
Definitions: card(x) < card(y) iff x subnumerous_to y
card(x) > card(y) iff card(y) < card(x)
/ Theory definition finished.
I do think that this theory is mostly inconsistent, because ordered
pairs here can be of non singleton sets.
However I do believe that if there is a method to RESTRICT the
primitive 2-place function symbole [ ] (of ordered pairs) to be
applicable only for atoms, and add
the axiom of atom existence: exists y y is atomic
then I think we can come with a consistent theory.
Zuhair
The idea behind this theory is to avoid the accumulative heirarchy of
sets in setc ....
Zuhair
.
- References:
- Flat sets.
- From: Zaljohar
- Flat sets.
- Prev by Date: Re: The definition of finite set
- Next by Date: Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- Previous by thread: Re: Flat sets.
- Next by thread: (paypal accept)(www.world-wholesaler.com) cheap wholesale Sunglasses 1).Gucci Sunglasses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|