Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: Alan Smaill <smaill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:48:59 +0000
Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Boyer and Moore claimed that they did in the title of the article: "A
Mechanical Proof . . ." but upon reading the article you see that they
then watered the claim down to "verified" a hand generated proof, a
meaningless exercise. You and they are talking about the same
nonsense, verifiying a hand written proof, when what is needed is to
generate the theorem, as I describe.
A highly misleading account of the paper in question.
There is a good deal more than proof checking involved.
--
Alan Smaill
.
- References:
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Set theory and identity theory
- Next by Date: Re: Choice and Dedekindian sets.
- Previous by thread: Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- Next by thread: Re: How do We Know that ZF is the Axiomatization that Proves everything Provable?
- Index(es):