Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: Herman Jurjus <hjurjus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:47:48 +0100
Robert E. Beaudoin wrote:
Sure it is, and that's provable in ZF: Let R be the result of iterating the power set operation \omega_1 times, starting from the empty set; R is provably (in ZF) a set. By \epsilon-induction any hereditarily countable set (i.e. any set whose transitive closure is countable) will be an element of R, and so the collection of hereditarily countable sets is a subset of R.
Very good.
Question: does the result still hold if we leave out the wellfoundedness axiom?
--
Cheers,
Herman Jurjus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: Robert E. Beaudoin
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- References:
- Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: reasterly
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: Peter Webb
- Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- From: Robert E. Beaudoin
- Largest Set in ZFC?
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Next by Date: ftv isabella soprano porn movies and photos. Video archive
- Previous by thread: Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- Next by thread: Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- Index(es):