all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...

all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill it is proven that
systems are consistent

they all say IF the system is consistent then it is incomplete

so untill they PROVE whether the system is consistent
the proofs say nothing about mathematical reality

they remain just conjecture untill they prove systems are consistent
so all this *** about what godels incompleteness prof means for
math
physics
commmunication
computers
is all worthless *** untill it is proven the systems are consistent
you can say'
but
we must assume maths is consistent or else it is all meaningless ***
is not good enough just because you need it to be consistent does not make
it so or prove it

until you prove it incompleteness proofs are just conjecture and have no
bearing on mathematical reality-which could be inconsistent

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html

.

Loading