Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 17, 8:43 am, Alan Smaill <sma...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mar 17, 4:47 am, Alan Smaill <sma...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also ignored was my pointer posted earlier to a machine-checked proof
of Tarski's fixed point theorem, and the theory of recursive
functions, both in ZF.
I searched through your recent posting history but couldn't find
these.
Could you please repost the pointer(s)? I'd appreciate it.
www.publications.cl.cam.ac.uk/167/
Paulson, Lawrence C. (1995) Set Theory for Verification: II. Induction
and Recursion. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 15 (2). pp. 167-215.
That page wouldn't load for me, but you gave me enough information
that I could find it on citeseer:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/341657.html
Abstract
A theory of recursive definitions has been mechanized in Isabelle's
Zermelo-Fraenkel (ZF) set theory. The objective is to support the
formalization of particular recursive definitions for use in
verification, semantics proofs and other computational
reasoning. Inductively defined sets are expressed as least
fixedpoints, applying the Knaster-Tarski Theorem over a suitable
set. Recursive functions are defined by well-founded recursion and its
derivatives, such as transfinite recursion. Recursive data structures
are expressed by applying the Knaster-Tarski Theorem to a set, such as
V, that is closed under Cartesian product and disjoint sum. Worked
examples include the transitive closure of a relation, lists,
variable-branching trees and mutually recursive trees and forests. The
Schroder-Bernstein Theorem and the soundness of propositional logic
are proved in Isabelle sessions.
Thanks again! Looks very interesting. Probably most of it will go over
my head, but I'll give it my best shot.
Marshall
.
- References:
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: William Hale
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Marshall
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Next by Date: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Godel proved maths inconsistent not incompleteness theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|