Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness

"R. Srinivasan" <sradhakr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

A new logic like NAFL is self-evidently noteworthy and that explains
their silence. An attempt to ridicule NAFL would be like a fool's
venture.... and your "heavyweight" peers are not fools. I will grant
that much to them.

You really should cut out this silly talk about "heavyweights" being
threatened by your toy logic. It is a pretty transparent sign of
crankery.

New logics are *not* self-evidently noteworthy and apathy doesn't
require a conspiracy. Do you really believe that the bigwig logicians
have all learned of NAFL and subsequently made a pact not to comment
on it? Do you think that most or all top-tier logicians have
discretely and secretly read your work?

Do you really not understand how nutty that sounds?

--
"Start obeying math rules, or if you prefer I can proceed to tear away
your illusions of being rational and logical piece by piece over time,
as I reduce your society using advanced psychological tools that rival
the best psychological warfare techniques of world governments." --JSH
.

Loading