Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness

"R. Srinivasan" <sradhakr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Why don't you stop using words like "crankery", "nutty", "toy logic",
etc and instead either address or ask your colleagues to address the
following issues:

Because I'm not interested at present. Is that so hard to understand?

Do you really think that every logician is fascinated enough by the
prospect of a new logic that he drops whatever he's working on in
order to learn about, evaluate and respond to the proposal?

Apathy is the default response. We each have our own interests. If
you want someone to give a clear criticism of your proposal, submit it
to a journal or conference. It's not a perfect strategy; there are
many reviewers that feel no guilt in submitting a fairly thoughtless
review, sadly. But you have a better chance to get a reasonable
reaction from a reviewer than from Usenet.

--
"There are people [...] who think it's socially acceptable to level
accusations of mental illness in insulting exchanges to make
points[...] [They] are rather sick [them]selves, and in reality, are
sociopathic." --- James Harris, evidently a self-described sociopath
.