Finite : A definition
- From: Zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
The following is my definition of 'x is finite' and I think it is
equivalent to the standard definition:
x is finite <-> E!y (y is a V.N. ordinal & Ef(f:y->x,f is bijective))
V.N. stands for Von Neumann ordinal.
In words: x is finite if and only if there exist a unique Von Neumann
ordinal that is bijective to x.
One can see that all Dedekindian infinite classes are bijective to
multiple V.N. ordinals.On the other hand a 'Dedekindian finite that is
at the same time a standard infinite class' will not have a bijection
to a Von Neumann ordinal.
So the above definition is equivalent to the standard definition.
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Finite : A definition
- Prev by Date: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Next by Date: Re: Finite : A definition
- Previous by thread: Finite: A definition,
- Next by thread: Re: Finite : A definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|