Re: Finite : A definition
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 19, 6:54 pm, Zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
a definition that is
not circular but yet gives the impression of circularity.
I have not even a simulacrum of care about such impressions. The
ordinary definition is not circular. If someone not informed has an
"impression" that it's circular, then he just needs to get informed.
Also it is less complex than the bi-directional well orderability
definition.
That's not at all evident, especially if we calculate all the prior
definitions needed to arrive at the definition in question.
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Finite : A definition
- From: Zaljohar
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Finite : A definition
- From: Zaljohar
- Finite : A definition
- Prev by Date: Re: Largest Set in ZFC?
- Next by Date: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Previous by thread: Re: Finite : A definition
- Next by thread: Re: Finite : A definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading