Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: "elsiemelsi" <cyprinsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:45:43 -0500
you say
But Goedel did more than this. He proved in PM* *without using the
axiom of reducibility* that P is either omega-inconsistent, or
undecidable and incomplete. This is even more interesting
sorry he uses AR
axiom 1v
just as he uses peano axioms
axioms 1-3
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information at http://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: Rupert
- all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Prev by Date: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Next by Date: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Previous by thread: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Next by thread: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|