Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: Rupert <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 21, 5:43 pm, "elsiemelsi" <cyprin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
you say
He is not
using the axioms of P in his argument. He is talking about them and
the properties that they have.
i say
sorry
That's okay. I don't mind taking all this trouble to help you. It may
pay off eventually. :)
he states he is employing /using P in his proof
so what is he employing from PM
I told you what he was saying. You'll have to go and read it again and
make some effort to understand. Let me know if you need any further
help.
--
Message posted usinghttp://www.talkaboutscience.com/group/sci.logic/
More information athttp://www.talkaboutscience.com/faq.html
.
- References:
- all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: Rupert
- Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- From: elsiemelsi
- all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel's comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
- Next by Date: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Previous by thread: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Next by thread: Re: all the incompleteness proofs are worthless untill...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|